Cases 1 - 10 of 5,409
McLaughin v. Livingston County PD et al
as 6:2024cv06314
Plaintiff:
Casey McLaughin, Sr.
Defendant:
Livingston County PD and L. Babeswski Laslo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Shawn Livingston
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Talley v. McGorisk et al
as 1:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Timothy McGorisk, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin v. Livingston et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Melvin
Defendant:
Brooke Livingston, Austin Rubel, Andy Ivanoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leroy v. Livingston Manor Central School District
as 24-1241
Plaintiff:
CASE LEROY
Defendant:
LIVINGSTON MANOR CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT and JOHN P. EVANS, in his capacity as superintendent of schools of Livingston Manor Central School District
Timmons v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Timmons, III
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, David O. Livingston, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03598
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIVINGSTON v. UBER et al
as 2:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
UBER and LYFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Livingston v. Load One, LLC
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Erika Livingston
Defendant:
Load One, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
