Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Evans-Bey v. Cassady
as 4:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Evans-Bey
Respondent:
Jay Cassady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-22641
Plaintiff:
Lonny Evans
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Evans v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv22641
Plaintiff:
Lonny Evans
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABED, ET AL. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02939
Plaintiff:
SARA ABED , MARILYN ACCUNZO , ROBERT ALEXANDER and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv00157
Defendant:
Dolgencorp of New York, Inc., Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., Dolgencorp, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lonny Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Evans v. Lewis et al
as 1:2009cv05635
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Evans, Lonnie Evans, Lonnie Evans and others
Defendant:
J Lewis, John Doe # 210 and Village Of Hazel Crest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lonnie Evans v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-63431
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Evans
Defendant:
E.D. Bullard Co
Benjamin Darden, et al v. MO Dept of Corrections, et al
as 08-1592
Plaintiff:
C. J. Stewart, Chris Swearingin, Michael Vincent and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Benjamin Darden
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford and Dave Dormire
United States of America v. Evans
as 1:2008cv00941
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lonnie Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Stewart et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv04080
Plaintiff:
C.J. Stewart, Chris Swearingin, Michael Vincent and others
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford and Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
