Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Loy v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2026cv06100
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Loy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CLARK v. LOIS et al
as 2:2026cv05186
Plaintiff:
DORIAN CLARK and STEVEN JACOBS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER LOIS and JUDGE HENRY LEWANDOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EICHLER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2026cv02592
Plaintiff:
DARIUSZ J. EICHLER, LIZZIE FINNEY, ARLESIA FINNEY and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gordon v. Callegan et al
as 2:2026cv01604
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Gordon
Defendant:
Rickie Callegan, Karen Lyon, Barbara Morvant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Crow et al
as 3:2026cv00981
Plaintiff:
Heineken G. Ellis
Defendant:
Christel Crow, Austin Kerley, Chad Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotton v. Banks et al
as 1:2026cv02003
Plaintiff:
Rakeish Cotton
Defendant:
C. Banks, K. Eckenrod, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00341
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
