Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Newell v. Tate et al
as 5:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lee Newell, Jr.
Defendant:
DiDymus Tate, Prime Care Health Service, Lt. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ham et al
as 5:2022ct03115
Plaintiff:
Steven Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Ham, Sergeant Shirley, Lt. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sumter County Commissioner et al
as 4:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Defendant:
Sumter County Commissioner, Sheriff Anthony Dennis, Chief Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
McKenzie v. Glisson et al
as 5:2021cv03779
Plaintiff:
Dywain Camel McKenzie
Defendant:
Sr Cpl Glisson, Sr Cpl Gregg-Wright, Capt Sweat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Fonville et al
as 5:2020ct03339
Defendant:
Officer Cato, Officer Tolbert, Lt. Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Naquan Floyd McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Dennies et al
as 6:2019cv02681
Defendant:
Cpt Lumpkin, Director McGhaniey, Capt Blandin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson and Charles Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Perry et al
as 5:2015ct03305
Plaintiff:
Michael Burton
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Mr. Hale, Dr. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kates v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv13412
Plaintiff:
David E. Kates
Defendant:
Lt. Martin and Tonya Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flowers v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 8:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
Carmichael T Flowers
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of , South Carolina Dept of Corr , Bryan P Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Davis et al
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Andre W. Wise
Defendant:
Keith Davis, J. Boone, Captin Ruffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
