Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Luyando-Ortiz et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04759
Plaintiff:
Christian Luyando-Ortiz
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Antoine
as 22-2740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Empress Hadiya Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Mancilla, #23627, Henri Roc, Sergeant Francis Shea and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Barnett, Andrew Cuomo, Ms. Brianna and others
In re: Ivan Luyando-Hildago
as 22-1844
Petitioner:
In re: IVAN LUYANDO-HILDAGO
Respondent:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility
Luyando-Hildago #743409 v. Campbell
as 1:2022cv00835
Petitioner:
Ivan Luyando-Hildago #743409
Respondent:
Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bey v. Antoine
as 22-1908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Empress Hadiya Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Mancilla, #23627, Henri Roc, Sergeant Francis Shea and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Barnett, Andrew Cuomo, Ms. Brianna and others
Luyando-Hildago #743409 v. Macauley
as 1:2021cv00986
Petitioner:
Ivan Luyando-Hildago #743409
Respondent:
Matt MaCauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buchanan v. Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp
as 21-1723
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David Buchanan, on behalf of himself, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs and the Class, Eva Figueroa, Javon Jones and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. and The Pay-O-Matic Corp.
Intervenor:
Carmen Luyando
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
