Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spurlock v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2023cv01029
Plaintiff:
Lyman Spurlock
Defendant:
Benjamin, Parole Officer and E Squad Officer
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. Warden of FCI El Reno
as 3:2023cv00961
Petitioner:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent:
Warden of FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lyman v. USA
as 7:2023cv01217
Petitioner:
Jerrod Dupree Lyman, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff
as 23-10268
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent / Appellee:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Lyman v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Alexandro Lyman and Alexandro Layman
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Party, Maricopa County Lower Buckeye Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. Johnson County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
David Lyman Spalding
Respondent:
Johnson County Sheriff and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spalding v. NLN (3:23-cv-285)
as 3:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
David Lyman Spalding
Defendant:
NFN NLN (3:23-cv-285), Coleen Peters, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
David Lyman Spalding
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
