Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Pryor v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00862
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lynne Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Cherry v. Howie et al
as 5:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ann Cherry
Defendant:
Guy Howie , Jefferson Alexander , Hopkinsville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leavell v. Pryor
as 5:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Desmond L. Leavell
Defendant:
Lynn Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pryor et al
as 5:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lislie Johnson
Defendant:
Lynn Pryor, Atkins and Chris Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nakia Dillard v. Vincent Yustas, et al
as 09-5716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAKIA DILLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT YUSTAS, Public Defender, Dept. Public Advocacy, GARY HADDOCK, Circuit Clerk, Christian County Circuit Court and PATRICIA LYNN PRYOR, Prosecutor, Christian County Circuit Court
Dillard v. Yustas et al
as 5:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Nakia Dillard
Defendant:
Vincent Yustas, Gary Haddock and Patricia Lynn Pryor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnica Pryor v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-40303
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNICA LYNN PRYOR
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Pryor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2008cv00247
Petitioner:
Johnica Lynn Pryor
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ameritech Ben Plan, et al v. Foster-Hall, et al
as 1:1997cv01441
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Marsha D Johnson, Loyce J Newton, Brenda Gildersleeve and others
Plaintiff:
Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Ameritech Pension Plan, New Media Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Local 188 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Phyllis Barnes, Betty Bober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
