Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Solomon #301631 v. Golloday et al
as 2:2011cv00287
Defendant:
Unknown Golloday, Glen Carol, Patricia L. Caruso and others
Plaintiff:
Martin T. Solomon #301631
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMAHON et al v. AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO. et al
as 2:2010cv82073
Plaintiff:
JANE H. MCMAHON and PHILLIP M. MCMAHON
Defendant:
AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gadd v. Schwartzkopf, et al
as 09-8100
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. GADD
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA A. SCHWARTZKOPF, DONNA NICHOLS, JAMES A. EDDINGTON and others
Movant To Intervene - Appellant:
MARIE M. MCMAHON
Mesko, et al v. Cabletron Systems, et al
as 1:1997cv00542
Consol Plaintiff:
Philip Adler, Karen Borick, Richard Durr and others
Defendant:
All Defendants, Craig R. Benson, Cabletron Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, BGC Investment Club, BYSG Capital and others
Consol Defendant:
David J. Kirkpatrick, Donald F. McGuinness and Don Reed
Interested Party:
Timothy M. Smith, Sr.
Notice Only:
US District Court - RI, Clerk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Warner v. McMahon et al
as 2:2008cv01149
Plaintiff:
Lance Warner
Defendant:
M. McMahon, B. Landingham, I. Larson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warner v. McMahon et al
as 2:2008cv01144
Plaintiff:
Lance Warner
Defendant:
M - McMahon, B Landingham, I Larson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McMahon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
Tamara M. McMahon and Tamara M. McMahon
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
McMahon v. Herbert & Constancia Ross et al
as 3:2007cv00316
Plaintiff:
Ava M. McMahon
Defendant:
Herbert & Constancia Ross and Specialized Contract Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
