Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Collins v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv00352
Plaintiff:
Katherine Nicole Collins
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
COLLINS v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04755
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE COLLINS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Gubster et al
as 1:2026cv08841
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Brian Davis
Defendant:
Jane Gubster, Thomas Dart, Collins and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COLLINS v. SAMMONS et al
as 5:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
ROBIN VERNON COLLINS
Defendant:
JUDGE ANGELA SAMMONS and ATTORNEY LEE PEACOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randolph v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv04481
Plaintiff:
Jordan Randolph
Defendant:
John B Collins, John J Toomey, Jennifer A Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Collins et al
as 2:2026cv01589
Plaintiff:
Russel Johnson
Defendant:
Kairon Collins, Terri Perry, PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
