Cases 11 - 20 of 37
LAWYERS UNITED INC. et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2019cv03222
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., AMIT P MEHTA, JON S TIGAR and others
Not Classified By Court:
JEFFREY S WHITE, RU D MOSS and EVELY AIMEE DE JESUS
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS UNITED INC, LAWYERS UNITED INC. and EVELYN AIMEE DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00509
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JAMES et al v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 668 et al
as 2:2019cv00053
Plaintiff:
MEGAN M. JAMES, ANGELA PEASE and WILLIAM A. LESTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NEWSOME, GERARD OLEKSIAK, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 668 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03295
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith et al v. Survillion et al
as 1:2014cv06474
Plaintiff:
Syrteea L. Smith , Alexis M. James and Jasmine D. Allen
Defendant:
Allen F. Survillion , Mary L. Solidum and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.O.L.T. et al v. City of Rancho Cordova et al
as 2:2014cv01588
Plaintiff:
B.O.L.T. , Mark Temple , John Dalke and others
Defendant:
City of Rancho Cordova, County of Sacramento, Rancho Cordova Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
