Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Jennings et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Peter Jennings and Chantell M. Jennings
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
JENNINGS v. USA
as 1:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M. JENNINGS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
JENNINGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03561
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M JENNINGS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Reardon et al
as 5:2020cv06113
Defendant:
Ryan Crews, M Jennings, R Brownlow and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bamberg v. The Results Companies, LLC
as 0:2020cv61420
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bamberg, Shandellah Martin, Amanda Mesot and others
Defendant:
The Results Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jennings v. Davis et al
as 2:2020cv00233
Respondent:
Captain Royal Eanes and Jim Davis
Petitioner:
Brandon M. Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jennings v. Eanes
as 2:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Jennings and Mustafa Beezy Bey
Defendant:
Captain Royal Eanes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENNINGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32449
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EBONY M JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. USA Republic Corporation
as 2:2019cv00418
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Beezy Bey and Brandon M. Jennings
Defendant:
USA Republic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
