Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Clark v. Goldstein et al
as 3:2022cv02962
Plaintiff:
Loureece Stone Clark
Defendant:
Mark H. Goldstein, James M. Kim, Robert T. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Johnson v. IBIS Styles Hotel, et al
as 22-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
IBIS STYLES HOTEL, MISS RODRIGUEZ, ANDREA EADDY and others
JOHNSON v. IBIS STYLES HOTEL et al
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
IBIS STYLES HOTEL, MISS RODRIGUEZ, ANDREA EADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 22-15050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CHUDY, M.D., THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D. and others
Gillispie v. Roselli et al
as 1:2021cv05124
Plaintiff:
M Kim Gillispie
Defendant:
Lawyer Fred Roselli and Frederick Roselli & Family
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillispie v. Police Officers et al
as 1:2021cv05125
Plaintiff:
M Kim Gillispie
Defendant:
Police Officers, Judges, Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillispie v. Smash & Stash Jewelers et al
as 1:2021cv05129
Plaintiff:
M Kim Gillispie
Defendant:
Smash & Stash Jewelers, Frank Kravitz and Jerry Kravitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. Joseph Chudy, et al
as 21-16110
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director of CDCR, A. TRAQUINA, M.D., CMO, NORMA ACQUVA, M.D., HCM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
