Cases 11 - 20 of 48
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M v. Philbeck et al
as 2:2017cv02763
Plaintiff:
M M
Defendant:
David Philbeck , Cherokee County Sheriff Department, Cherokee County South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominquez v. Schneiderman et al
as 6:2016cv06292
Plaintiff:
Ralph Dominquez
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Peter H. Schiff, Marcus J. Mastracco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wanzer v. Kotzur et al
as 5:2015cv01164
Defendant:
E. Alaniz, Jr., D. A. Brown, P. Chapa and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Packnett v. Alvarez et al
as 4:2015cv01229
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jerome Packnett
Defendant:
Fernand Alvarez, Alison Pachynski, B Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGS v. GIELOW
as 3:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS L SPRINGS
Defendant:
W L GIELOW, M ALLEN, A BEASLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Parks et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Chauncey A. Williams
Defendant:
J. E. Parks, M. L. Taylor, D. B. Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2012cv01454
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
M M Mitchell, L. Rosario and R. Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6899
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Party-in-Interest:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maldonado v. Fulwood et al
as 3:2011cv00878
Petitioner:
Alfredo Maldonado
Respondent:
Issac Fulwood and M M Mitchel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
