Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
REDMON v. BISIGNANO
as 3:2026cv00264
Plaintiff:
LISA A. REDMON
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
REDMON v. NOVO NORDISK INC., et al
as 2:2026cv02365
Plaintiff:
CANDICE REDMON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Redmon v. Unknown
as 3:2026cv00210
Plaintiff:
John Redmon
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmon v. Unknown
as 3:2026cv00072
Plaintiff:
John W. Redmon, II
Defendant:
Taylor Roberts and Weatsh Weast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
REDMON v. CUNEO CONSULTING et al
as 2:2025cv03151
Unknown:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
LA'DAMEYON REDMON
Defendant:
CUNEO CONSULTING LLC doing business as CUNEO SECURITY and CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
REDMON v. CUNEO CONSULTING LLC D/BA CUNEO SECURITY et al
as 2:2025cv03150
Plaintiff:
LA'DAMEYON REDMON
Defendant:
CUNEO CONSULTING LLC D/BA CUNEO SECURITY and CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
United States v. Malcolm Redmon
as 25-3055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Malcolm Desean Redmon, also known as Malcolm Deshawn Redmon, also known as Malcolm Redmond, also known as Harp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
