Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REEVES v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv54470
Plaintiff:
ALBERT M. REEVES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
REEVES v. NATALIE TANKSHIPS CORP.
as 5:2011cv54111
Plaintiff:
ALBORT M. REEVES
Defendant:
NATALIE TANKSHIPS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
REEVES v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68290
Plaintiff:
ALBERT M. REEVES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
REEVES v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54980
Plaintiff:
ALBERT M REEVES
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Williams v. Reeves et al
as 6:2011cv06022
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Williams
Defendant:
M Reeves, Steed and Larry Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Reeves et al
as 4:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Williams
Defendant:
M Reeves, Steed and Garland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Reeves, Jr. et al
as 1:2011cv01119
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Robert L Reeves, Jr. and Shawna M Reeves
Cause Of Action: Mortgage Foreclosure
Ballew v. Doe et al
as 6:2011cv06010
Plaintiff:
Stacy Maurice Ballew
Defendant:
John Doe Police Officer, M. Reeves, Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College v. Reeves et al
as 2:2011cv00197
Defendant:
Archie F. Reeves, Donna M Reeves, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Intervenor:
Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
