Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOPKINS v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as 2:2026cv03068
Plaintiff:
ADAM HOPKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.), AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., AGC, INC. (f/k/a Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Stanfield-Parker v. Adams County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2026cv03378
Plaintiff:
Jason Stanfield-Parker
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff's Office, Adam Kimerling, John Bitterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herman et al v. Crow et al
as 2:2026cv05282
Plaintiff:
Charles Herman and Han Gia Nguyen
Defendant:
Michael M Crow, Daniel Drane, III, Regina Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christoff v. Dyer
as 3:2026cv01010
Plaintiff:
Kyla Christoff, Brady McAninch and John Hipskind
Defendant:
Adam Dyer, Jeffrey D Lester and Dylan L McCloskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Adams v. United States of America
as 4:2026cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adams
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
