Cases 1 - 10 of 492
White Oak Global Advisors LLC v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv02128
Defendant:
THOMAS M CLARKE, Ana M CLARKE and David WILEY
Plaintiff:
WHITE OAK GLOBAL ADVISORS LLC
Trustee:
Thomas M. Clarke and Ana M. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ej Diversity-Enforcement of Judgment
CLARKE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. CLARKE, III
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Clark (PS) v. Wolford et al
as 1:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Andre M. Clark
Defendant:
Jacob Wolford and Doyle Dunnam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sanchez v. DOJ
as 23-40708
Plaintiff:
Paul Eric Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Robert F. Bryson, ATF Internal Affairs, Agent Graden, ATF Internal Affairs and others
Trigo ADR Americas, LLC v. OEM Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Trigo ADR Americas, LLC
Defendant:
OEM Logistics, LLC, Steven M. Clarke and Jay A. Nicholas
Clark v. USA
as 4:2023cv00876
Petitioner:
Shannon M Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murzike v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
D. Allen, A. Woren, M.G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
