Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Courtney v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04731
Plaintiff:
Josef M. Courtney
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, MERS, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Banes v. US
as 21-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS, GEORGE MANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Pena v. US
as 21-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHRYN B. ZIEMBA, HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Courtney v. Clarke
as 1:2020cv01279
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Petitioner:
Tavoris M. Courtney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney v. Housing Authority of the County of Kings et al
as 1:2020cv01296
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the County of Kings, Board of Supervisors of the County of Kings and California Department of Fair Employment and Housing
Plaintiff:
Colleen M. Courtney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Courtney v. Arbon
as 1:2020cv00118
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Courtney
Defendant:
Ryan Arbon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tavoris Courtney v. Timothy Hauer
as 19-7819
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS DUNCAN, Commonwealth Attorney and TIMOTHY J. HAUER, Honorable Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAVORIS M. COURTNEY
Courtney v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv01180
Defendant:
Unknown, Timothy J. Hauer and Dennis M. Duncan
Plaintiff:
Tavoris M. Courtney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colleen Courtney v. Andrew Saul
as 19-15995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLLEEN M. COURTNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of Social Security and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
