Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Caffey v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eric Lydell Caffey
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dewayne Hendrix, M D Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doering v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Alan Doering
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, M D Reed, Budnick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00590
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, M D Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulhakim Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Barr et al
as 2:2021cv00060
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, Rosalez, Sheila S Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
LaJwhan Donnelle Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson v. Garland et al
as 2:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, M D Carvajal, Rosalez and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Julius Donaldson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guirlando et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv01046
Defendant:
Captain Richard Mitcham, Donald J Trump, ADAM COHEN and others
Plaintiff:
JASON PARMELEY and Marco Anthony Guirlando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baxter Nutrition, LLC et al v. CNMC Holdings, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00195
Plaintiff:
Cuau, LLC, Yotta, LLC, Diebert Enterprises, Inc and others
Defendant:
CNMC Holdings, LLC and CNMC Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero Munoz v. Fouad et al
as 0:2018cv02973
Defendant:
M D Construction, Mesud Didovic, Mervat Fouad and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Romero Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Munoz v. Fouad et al
as 0:2018cv01418
Defendant:
Mervat Fouad , MRANS on Seventh, LLC , M & D Management Company and others
Plaintiff:
Merced Romero Munoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamilton v. Wubker et al
as 4:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Clay D Hamilton, Sr
Defendant:
Warren Wubker, Steve Wubker, Transaction Data Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
