Cases 1 - 10 of 97
SHAIKH v. GERMADNIG et al
as 1:2026cv07037
Plaintiff:
ZIA H. SHAIKH
Defendant:
LAURA GERMADNIG, NANCY CAVANAUGH, SETH ARKUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Zia H. Shaikh
as 26-1772
Petitioner:
In re: ZIA SHAIKH
Respondent:
DEBORAH H. SCHRON, MARLENE L. FORD, MADELINE F. EINBINDER and others
SHAIKH v. SCHRON et al
as 3:2025cv18698
Plaintiff:
ZIA H. SHAIKH
Defendant:
DEBORAH H. SCHRON, Marlen L. Ford, MADELINE F. EINBINDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaikh v. Schron et al
as 1:2025cv10168
Plaintiff:
Zia H. Shaikh
Defendant:
Deborah H. Schron, Marlen L. Ford, Madeline F. Einbinder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaikh v. Germadnig et al
as 1:2025cv10148
Plaintiff:
Zia H. Shaikh
Defendant:
Laura L. Germadnig, Nancy Cavanaugh, Slava Kleyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORE et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2025cv03028
Plaintiff:
FRED D. MOORE, LISA M. INGRAM, GARY C. MOORE and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00801
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sudano v. Warden
as 1:2025cv02516
Plaintiff:
Santino Eustace Sudano
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
First Baptist Church Eustace v. Covington Specialty Insurance Company
as 6:2025cv00217
Plaintiff:
First Baptist Church Eustace
Defendant:
Covington Specialty Insurance Company
Pretrial Service:
Sheryl O'Briant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Maack et al
as 1:2025cv02541
Plaintiff:
Kara Johnson
Defendant:
Noah Maack, Ryan Eustace, Charles Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
