Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Glenn v. Bossier City et al
as 5:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Travis M Glenn
Defendant:
City of Bossier City, Jail of Bossier City and Bossier City Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Kirkland Police Department
as 2:2022cv01485
Plaintiff:
Travis M Glenn
Defendant:
Kirkland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glenn v. Rainwater et al
as 3:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Glenn
Defendant:
Daulton Rainwater and Zachary Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackburn et al v. Novavax, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01417
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Blackburn and Michele Rosati
Defendant:
Novavax, Inc., Stanley C. Erck, Gregory F. Covino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Snyder v. Erck et al
as 8:2022cv01415
Plaintiff:
Amy Snyder
Defendant:
Stanley C. Erck, John J. Trizzino, Gregory M. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jackson v. G-Tech Elevator Associates LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04760
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
G-Tech Elevator Associates LLC, Brock M. Glenn and Dominick A. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acuna v. Pollard et al
as 3:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Alex Istok Acuna
Defendant:
Marcus Pollard, M. Glenn, R. Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Acuna v. Pollard et al
as 3:2021cv01910
Plaintiff:
Alex I. Acuna
Defendant:
Marcus Pollard, M. Glenn, R. Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
USA v. Demaine Glenn
as 21-3055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMAINE M. GLENN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
