Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Christopher Simmons v. S. Zamora, et al
as 17-15658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ISAAC SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ZAMORA, DOE, Chief Medical Office Doe, ROBERT KELDGORD and others
Koonce #596551 v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Koonce #596551
Defendant:
Andrew Johnson, J. Koenigsknecht, S. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Berry v. Apker et al
as 4:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gregory MacDonald Berry
Defendant:
Craig Apker, A Mendes, A Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07379
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Koonce et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2010cv03612
Plaintiff:
Delores M Koonce , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shoemake III et al v. Koonce et al
as 6:2010cv00576
Plaintiff:
Tom Shoemake III and Shoemake Enterprises, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Larry M. Koonce and Paul Michael Esposito, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Simmons v. CDCR et al
as 1:2010cv00553
Plaintiff:
Christopher Simmons
Defendant:
CDCR , Kern Valley State Prison, S. Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. CDCR et al
as 1:2010at00221
Plaintiff:
Christoper Simmons
Defendant:
CDCR , Kern Valley State Prison, S. Zamora and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koonce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv02283
Plaintiff:
Archie M. Koonce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
