Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Marr et al v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as 2:2026cv05644
Defendant:
TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS L.P., individually and as successor-in-interest to The Ansul Company, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, indivdually and as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, NATIONAL FOAM, INC and others
Plaintiff:
CHEMDESIGN PRODCUTS, INC., Martinique Mercer, Maricela Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tiller v. McCoy et al
as 7:2026cv00897
Defendant:
OLES R. Chris Colman, CO Costa, Lt. Henry May and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Tiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2026cv04299
Defendant:
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Miles M. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
United States v. Sylvester McCoy
as 26-3282
Defendant:
Sylvester McCoy
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cary v. Ruddy et al
as 1:2026cv03268
Defendant:
Mario Orlando, Lackawanna Medical Armored, Tim Betti and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tyler Cary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holden v. McCoy et al
as 2:2026cv03661
Defendant:
Najara and McCoy
Plaintiff:
Jim B. Holden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Ranson et al
as 2:2026cv00699
Defendant:
Ofc. Fowler, Booking Ofc. Mickey, Booking Ofc. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Moore et al
as 2:2026cv03635
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Amber Amacker, David Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Mister T. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Runyon et al
as 2:2026cv00703
Defendant:
Sgt. Hayes, Cpl. Dustin McCoy and Cpl Cassady Runyon
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
