Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Russell et al v. Swisher Hygiene, Inc. et al
as 3:2012md02384
Plaintiff:
Norman Russell , Michael C. Birch , Lisa M. Birch and others
Movant:
John Nobel , Bryan T. McMahon , Joseph Meives and others
Defendant:
Swisher Hygiene, Inc. , Steven R. Berrard , Michael J. Kipp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pruitt v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00407
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M Pruitt
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hines v. Robinson et al
as 6:2012cv01834
Plaintiff:
Willie Junior Hines
Defendant:
Chad Robinson, Adetoro Sobowale, Amy Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arsenault et al v. Berrard et al
as NYS/1:12-cv-04028
Plaintiff:
Clarence Arsenault
Defendant:
Steven R. Berrard , Michael J. Kipp , David Braley and others
Arsenault et al v. Berrard et al
as 1:2012cv04028
Plaintiff:
Clarence Arsenault
Defendant:
Steven R. Berrard, Michael J. Kipp, David Braley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. DeGeorgis et al
as 6:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B DeGeorgis, C/O Garrison, D M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. DeGeorgis et al
as 8:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B DeGeorgis, C/O Garrison, D M McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wessel et al v. US Dept of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
as 6:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Katy Wessel and John Mehan
Defendant:
Lewis & Clark County , LaDonna M. Schumacher, Leon M. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
