Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Woodson v. ALBRIGHT et al
as 1:2026cv22672
Plaintiff:
Antonio Demarcus Woodson
Defendant:
ASHLEY K. ALBRIGHT, Thomas R. Bakkedahl, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jordan, Sr. v. City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2026cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roderick Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Murfreesboro Police Department, Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shnatzmeyer v. State Farm
as 25-11369
Plaintiff:
Mark Shnatzmeyer and Carole Sandlin
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Sandlin v. Walker Baptist Hospital et al
as 7:2025cv02114
Plaintiff:
Adam Robert Sandlin
Defendant:
Walker Baptist Hospital and Aftad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sandlin v. Williams et al
as 7:2025cv02101
Plaintiff:
Adam Robert Sandlin
Defendant:
Kevin Williams and Marion County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman-Aeh et al v. City of Portsmouth, Ohio et al
as 1:2025cv00808
Plaintiff:
Bradleigh Aeh and Michelle Hickman-Aeh
Defendant:
City of Portsmouth, Scioto County, Debra Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Ryzman Foundation Inc. v. Muza et al
as 3:2025cv09653
Defendant:
Nana Muza, Michael J. Fink, Nana Sandlin and others
Plaintiff:
THE RYZMAN FOUNDATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-13654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sandlin v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2025cv01825
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Sandlin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
