Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Joseph Rued, et al v. Judge Charlene Hatcher, et al
as 23-3092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Daryll Rued, W.O.R., Minor Child, Scott Daryll Rued and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Charlene W. Hatcher, Hennepin County District Court, Jennifer L Frisch, Minnesota Court of Appeals Judicial Officer, Sarah I. Wheelock, Minnesota Court of Appeals Judicial Officer and others
Rued et al v. Hatcher et al
as 0:2023cv02685
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daryll Rued, W.O.R., Scott Daryll Rued and others
Defendant:
Judge Charlene W. Hatcher, Jennifer L. Frisch, Sarah I. Wheelock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Currie
as 4:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Leslie M. Smith
Defendant:
Michael Currie and Currie Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Benter v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Dan Heidbreder, Troy Kelly, State of North Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benter v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Dan Heidbreder, Troy Kelly, State of North Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ross-Patterson v. Smith et al
as 4:2017cv00846
Plaintiff:
Willie B. Ross-Patterson
Defendant:
Precious M. Smith and Terrill D. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
