Cases 41 - 50 of 549
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
JAMES DENNING
Defendant:
WALKER, REED, RIORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Miller v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 22-16207
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLIFFORD W. MILLER
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANAS
Defendant:
PATRICIA M. SMITH, JAMES E. DZURENDA, STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections and others
OAKLEY v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
CODY OAKLEY
Defendant:
CHRISTAN M SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil Green v. M. Smith, et al
as 22-1658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIL R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SMITH, Custody Officer for MSI Garment Factory, D. PELLER, Classification Director and S. THOMPSON, RUM
PRINTUP v. SMITH et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
M. SMITH, JR., C. WAINMAN, J. JOBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields #257135 v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Handson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody M Smith and Shawn A Caziarc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil Green v. M. Smith, et al
as 22-1633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIL R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SMITH, Custody Officer for MSI Garment Factory, D. PELLER, Classification Director and S. THOMPSON, RUM
Bozeman v. Smith
as 3:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
David Bozeman
Defendant:
C/O M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lutz et al
as 2:2022cv02793
Plaintiff:
Cameron M Smith
Defendant:
Matthew Lutz, Brice Swiney, Mark Fleegle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
