Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Welsh v. Lamb County
as 26-10967
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Lamb County, in its Individual Capacity, Administrator Misty Diaz, Indvidual Capacity and Official Capacity as Policy Maker for Lamb County, Sheriff Gary Maddox, in his Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Marshall v. Maddox et al
as 1:2026cv06243
Plaintiff:
Terry Marshall
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, Ms. Brown and Ms. M. Bonu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 5:2026cv00450
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MADDOX
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Maddox v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv02852
Plaintiff:
Billy Maddox
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McAllister v. Cooley-Dismukes et al
as 5:2026ct03312
Plaintiff:
Anton Thurman McAllister
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley-Dismukes, Gary Junker, Josh Panter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Maddox Road Enterprises, LLC v. Hawkins
as 1:2026cv05586
Plaintiff:
Maddox Road Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Torie Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
