Cases 41 - 50 of 1,031
Malone v. USA
as 6:2023cv01313
Petitioner:
William Malone and William Claude Malone
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Antoine Malone, Sr. v. Joshua Kuiper
as 23-2817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINE G. MALONE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA KUIPER, LPN, also known as Josh Kuiper
McKnight v. Malone et al
as 1:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Gregory McKnight
Defendant:
Isaiah Malone and Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Ward-Malone v. United States
as 23-3038
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher J. Ward-Malone
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Johnson v. Kimbro et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Casey Kimbro, Ofc Piszner, Captain Mike Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. SHAVER et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN BRIAN SHAVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DELVIN PEOPLES, UNIT MANAGER NATALIE MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01781
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Scelza v. Porter et al
as 2:2023cv05825
Plaintiff:
Michael John Scelza
Defendant:
Jason Porter, Brandon Noles and Luke Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johns v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Lameek Shalam Johns
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
