Cases 1 - 10 of 7,903
Hill et al v. Toast, Inc,
as 1:2024cv11485
Plaintiff:
Meggan Hill, Benjamin Gorges, Christina Conte Wartinbee and others
Defendant:
Toast, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Vargas v. Covington et al
as 1:2024cv04308
Plaintiff:
Marcos L. Rodriguez Vargas
Defendant:
Michael A. Covington and JB Hunt Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Solis v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Marco Solis
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Walker v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Mose Walker
Defendant:
Robbin A Campbell, JR, Marco McClendon and West Memphis City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cardona, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv01031
Petitioner:
Marcos Cardona, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Verch v. ACM FATZ VII LLC
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Defendant:
ACM FATZ VII LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Watson v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Khalil Watson
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, Officer Jeremy Garcia, Officer Frank Corpus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marco Vargas v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv04579
Plaintiff:
Marco Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Ataides Gama, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3449
Petitioner:
MARCOS DAVI ATAIDES GAMA, ELIZABETH ALVES RIBEIRO GAMA, FILLIPE RIBEIRO GAMA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Loadsmart, Inc. v. Convoy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04409
Plaintiff:
Loadsmart, Inc.
Defendant:
Convoy, Inc., HERCULES CAPITAL, INC., Freight Link Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
