Cases 1 - 10 of 23
US v. Marcos Lopez
as 21-4520
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCOS RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ
United States of America v. Bonilla (Nolasco)
as 21-1258
Defendant:
Domingo Fernandez, Emmanuel Tavarez, Juan Bonilla, AKA A.D.A. Pinto and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Nelson Nolasco, AKA Menor, AKA Angel Soto-Caban
USA v. Marco Rodriguez
as 20-40779
Defendant / Appellant:
Marco Rodriguez, also known as Mike, also known as MC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. Rodriguez
as 20-3220
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL MARCOS RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Bivins v. Marco Rodriguez, et al
as 20-15983
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS SARABIA, California Highway Patrol Officer, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MARCO RODRIGUEZ, Deputy U.S. Marshal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN PENN BIVINS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Batista-Cubilete (Deaza-Alcala
as 17-3187
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marcos Antonio Batista-Cubilete, AKA Carlos Rosario, Andres Garcia, AKA Domingo Rosario, Yeury Natera and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ramirez Deaza-Alcala
Rodriguez et al v. San Diego Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv03019
Plaintiff:
Marcos Rodriguez, Grace Rodriguez and Amanda Davis
Defendant:
San Diego Police Department, Shelly Zimmerman, Las Vegas Metro Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv06380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
US v. Rodriguez-Maldonado
as 16-2111
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCOS RODRIGUEZ-MALDONADO, a/k/a Michael, a/k/a El Viejo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
