Cases 1 - 10 of 14
James Thompson et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv09490
Defendant:
Sal Rivituso, Does 1 through 50 inclusive, Eggleston Youth Center and others
Plaintiff:
M.T., Edward Thompson, E.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Wayne Coats, Southern Health Partners, Inc., Western Surety Company and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners for Creek County, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
Margaret Johnson
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for Creek County, Oklahoma , Steve Toliver , Randall Arnold, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Margaret Johnson v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 12-4390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARET JOHNSON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHAD A. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, WARDEN, THOMAS WEBSTER, MD, CHRISTOPHER MCCOY, RN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOHNSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2010cv05324
Plaintiff:
MARGARET JOHNSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS , MEDICAL CARRIERS AT TERREHAUTE INDIANA PRISON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
