Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Larry Bryant v. Adrian Zepeda, et al
as 11-3326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN ZEPEDA, #11439, MARK CAMPBELL, #16397 and CITY OF CHICAGO
Cash v. Sturch et al
as 6:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Cash
Defendant:
Bill Sturch, United States Marshal Service, Durant Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen Vaughn, Jr. v. Bobbie James, et al
as 11-2285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN E. VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBIE JAMES, MARK CAMPBELL, ANDREA PROPS and others
VAUGHN v. JAMES et al
as 1:2011cv00217
Defendant:
MARK CAMPBELL, ALAN FINANN, BOBBIE JAMES and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN E. VAUGHN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donaldson v. Canant et al
as 6:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kelly Patrick Donaldson
Defendant:
Doug Canant, Matt Stubblefield, Mark Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Arkansas State Hospital et al
as 4:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mark Campbell
Defendant:
Arkansas State Hospital, Billy J Burris and Stacy M McBain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman Nitz, Jr. v. Jean Harvey, et al
as 09-3110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERMAN L. NITZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEAN HARVEY, JOHN PERKINS, #55, MARK CAMPBELL and others
Nitz v. Harvey et al
as 1:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Herman L. Nitz, Jr.
Defendant:
Jean Harvey, John Perkins, Mark Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrod v. Montgomery County Police et al
as 8:2008cv03298
Plaintiff:
Darryl Harrod, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Police, Mark Campbell, Paul Lignorie and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vaughn Jr v. Props et al
as 3:2008cv00278
Plaintiff:
Allen Eugene Vaughn Jr
Defendant:
Andrea Props, William Young, Marion County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
