Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Henderson v. Gibson et al
as 5:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Mark Henderson
Defendant:
James Gibson, Hoot Gipson, James Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GDN v. Innovative Labs et al
as 2:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
GDN
Defendant:
Innovative Labs , Bio-Botanica and Scott Seedall
Counter_claimant:
Scott Seedall
Counter_defendant:
GDN
Thirdparty_defendant:
ADN Holdings , After Dark Brands, After Dark Enterprises and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Scott Seedall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
La Thi Hoang v. Douglas Stern et al
as 2:2017cv05096
Defendant:
Sharon Bailey, Raymond Barragan, Charlie Beck and others
Plaintiff:
Lan Thi Hoang
Henderson v. Decatur City Jail
as 5:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Larry Mark Henderson
Defendant:
Decatur City Jail
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS - PHILA. CO. et al
as 2:2017cv00111
Petitioner:
MARK HENDERSON
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS - PHILA. CO., PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORR. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Myotte et al
as 6:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Stacy G. Hall
Defendant:
Buddy Myotte, Alvin Fode, Trisdan Kohut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEA PHILADELPHIA COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv02445
Petitioner:
MARK HENDERSON
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEA PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henderson v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv01565
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mark Henderson
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories Inc, Eli Lilly & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunsmore v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dunsmore
Defendant:
Leroy Kirkegard, Tristan Kohut, Mark Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
