Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Fatemeh Mahalati v. Matthew Gary Shultz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00803
Plaintiff: Fatemeh Mahalati
Defendant: Matthew Gary Shultz and Gary Shultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
USA v. Matthew Leander, III
as 22-30019
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MATTHEW GARY LEANDER III
Matthew RichardsonIn re: Matthew Richardson
as 21-5653
Petitioner: In re: MATTHEW GARY RICHARDSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Aasgaard Company v. American Drug Free Powerlifting Association et al
as 8:2017cv03771
Plaintiff: The Aasgaard Company
Defendant: American Drug Free Powerlifting Association , Matthew Gary and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Matthew Richardson v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-5517
Petitioner - Appellant: MATTHEW GARY RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00691
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Richardson v. USA
as 3:2016cv00398
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Matthew Gary Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DOUGLAS v. CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff: BRANDON KENTRELL DOUGLAS
Defendant: CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA, SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA, BARRY BLOUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS v. CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA et al
as 1:2014cv00097
Plaintiff: BRANDON KENTRELL DOUGLAS
Defendant: CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA, BARRY BLOUNT, CARLA COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Muhammad (Johnson)
as 14-1677
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Mujahid Muhammad, AKA Doughboy, Jayren Wynn, AKA Richboy, Aaron Moore, AKA SK and others
Defendant - Appellant: Charles Johnson, AKA CJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?