Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Faison v. Williams, et al.
as 25-7772
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES FAISON and Bishop Son
Defendant:
THESSDUS WILLIAMS, TERRI WILLIAMS, JEAN WILLIAMS and others
Faison v. Williams et al
as 3:2025cv02148
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Faison and Bishop Son
Defendant:
Thessdus Williams, Terri Williams, Jean Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FAISON v. EDGELL
as 2:2025cv01830
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES FAISON
Defendant:
WALLY A. EDGELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson Faison v. Yellen et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Matthew Leo Jackson Faison, Jr. and Matthew James Faison Jr.
Defendant:
John Smith Doe, Janet Yellen, Larry Boker Moe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. Global Experts Outsourcing, et al
as 21-12585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAESTRO MATTHEW FAISON, a.k.a. Matthew James Faison, a.k.a. Leo Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING, GEO, CHARLES MAIORARIA, ANDRES MOLINA and others
Matthew Faison v. United States Social Security Commission
as 21-6998
Defendant / Appellee:
MIAMI SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. COMM. and UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES FAISON
Faison v. Faison et al
as 1:2018cv04556
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Columbia Correctional Institution, Donald Faison, George Mason Faison and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Faison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv07152
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Faison, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Vice President for (B of A) and Vice President for (B of A)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
