Cases 11 - 20 of 4,729
Crum v. Florida Commission on Offender Review et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jody Maurice Crum
Defendant:
Florida Commission on Offender Review, Mark Hiers, Melinda N. Coonrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominick Jones v. Linsia, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK MAURICE JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINSIA, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUNWIN, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAKE, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity and others
(PC) Davis v. Mandrigal et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Z. Mandrigal, T. Harris, Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Watts
Defendant:
Thompson and PrimeCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Maurice Geter
as 24-6405
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE DARNELL GETER, a/k/a Rease
Washington v. USA
as 1:2024cv03317
Petitioner:
Maurice Washington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Maurice Owen v. United States
as 24-1887
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antonio Owen, also known as Maurice Antonio Parham
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
