Cases 1 - 10 of 679
Johnson et al v. GIGSMART, INC.
as 3:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson and Christi McCracken
Defendant:
GIGSMART, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson et al v. GigSmart, Inc.
as 3:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Susan Johnson and Christi McCracken
Defendant:
GigSmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Mitchell et al v. McCracken County Jail Officers
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell, Michelle Bennett, Tabatha Bourgoin and others
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Heather Stewart
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Travis
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCracken v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Susan McCracken
Defendant:
United States of America
McCracken v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Richard McCracken and Richard James McCracken
Defendant:
William Hyatte and George Payne, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CARLA COAKLEY, M. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Adam L. Lee
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS LLP v. HANDLEY
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY MCCRACKEN WALKER & RHOADS LLP
Defendant:
MICHAEL K HANDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
