Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Solomon v. Chancey et al
as 2:2026cv12509
Plaintiff:
Martin Antonio Solomon
Defendant:
Chancey, James Corrigan, Brenda Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Davidson v. STUDIO MCGEE DESIGN LLC et al
as 2:2026cv07966
Plaintiff:
Ryan Davidson
Defendant:
STUDIO MCGEE DESIGN LLC and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grisham et al v. McGee et al
as 2:2026cv02502
Plaintiff:
Arnold T. Grisham and William J. Miller
Defendant:
Marcus McGee, MeBookMeta and Pegasus Books, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Grisham et al v. McGee et al
as 2:2026at01198
Plaintiff:
Arnold T. Grisham and William J. Miller
Defendant:
Marcus McGee, MeBookMeta and Pegasus Books, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McGee v. Bienemy
as 2:2026cv00716
Petitioner:
Christopher John McGee
Respondent:
J. Bienemy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
HARRIS v. ROGERS, et al.,
as 1:2026cv00653
Plaintiff:
TONY L. HARRIS-BEY
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, JAMES SECOR, III, DAVID CHURCHILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Bienemy
as 1:2026cv00158
Petitioner:
Christopher John McGee
Respondent:
J Bienemy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Erick Williams v. Dillon McKee, et al
as 26-2328
Plaintiff:
Erick Williams
Defendant:
Dillon McKee, Jailer, Dallas County Detention Center (Originally named Dillion McGee), Kathren Shuler, Jail Administrator, Dallas County Detention Center (Originally named Kathurn Shular) and Sarah Barnes, Assistant Jail Administrator, Dallas County Detention Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.