Cases 1 - 10 of 6,557
Medina (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2025cv00206
Plaintiff:
Tina Medina
Defendant:
USA, Philip A. Brimmer, Phillip A. Brimmer (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Bonilla et al
as 4:2025cv00567
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
John A. Mendez and Judge Chi Soo Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dan Adkins et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv00378
Plaintiff:
Howard Lipstreu, Terry Hartwig, Deborah Allen and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc., Doe Defendants 1-20, E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Martinez-Mendez v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv00342
Petitioner:
Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Martinez-Mendez v. united states of america
as 2:2025cv00344
Plaintiff:
Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez
Defendant:
united states of america
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Martinez-Mendez v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv00345
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Martinez-Mendez v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv00347
Plaintiff:
Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez v. United States of America
as 2:2025cv00349
Plaintiff:
Oliver Jair Martinez-Mendez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
