Cases 11 - 20 of 25
JILES v. TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv01561
Plaintiff:
PAUL JILES
Defendant:
TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, TRENTONIAN NEWSPAPER, MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Craig Blackmon
as 14-1575
Petitioner:
In re: CRAIG BLACKMON
Respondent:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
In re: Robert Edwards, et al
as 13-1826
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT LEE EDWARDS
Respondent:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
In re: Fever Talik, et al
as 13-1350
Petitioner:
In re: FEVER AL TALIK, AKA Don P. Finney
Respondent:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Michael Kanode, Sr. v. Derek Swope
as 12-8005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. KANODE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK C. SWOPE, Judge, SCOTT ASH, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, MIKE L. GILLS, Detective and others
PUMPHREY v. MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2011cv03243
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT PUMPHREY
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, EDWARD BELMONT and CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STUKES v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCER COUNTY et al
as 3:2008cv05671
Plaintiff:
ERNEST STUKES
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCER COUNTY and MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PUMPHREY v. MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
as 3:2008cv05680
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT PUMPHREY
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
