Cases 31 - 40 of 2,564
HENDERSON v. MERCER, et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
WADE MERCER, SALES PERSON EMPLOYEE, WILLIAMS R WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MERCER-SPENCER v. SPENCER et al
as 5:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
DEBRA M. MERCER-SPENCER
Defendant:
NATHANIL BRONDON SPENCER, SR., BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEMS and THE ARRESTING OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Emily Mercer
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keith Girvan v. Superintendent Mercer SCI, et al
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
KEITH GIRVAN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLARION COUNTY
GONZALEZ v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00207
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JUAN GONZALEZ
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MERCER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEGACY HOUSING CORPORATION v. MERCER
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
LEGACY HOUSING CORPORATION
Defendant:
BARRY MERCER
Petitioner:
CLAYTON MANUFACTURED HOMES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mercer v. NCL (Bahamas) LTD.
as 1:2024cv20450
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Mercer
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
