Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Carter v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Defendant:
Megan Hayes and Adams County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter et al v. Dupuy et al
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Amanda Carter and Michael Carter
Defendant:
Chad Dupuy, Jason Ard and Livingston Parish School Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walker v. Carter et al
as 2:2021cv01393
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Walker
Defendant:
Showanda Carter, Brianna Carter, Michael Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Davis v. City of Dawson Texas et al
as 3:2019cv01751
Defendant:
CITY OF DAWSON, MICHAEL CARTER and City of Dawson Texas
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BERNARD DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Netter et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2019cv00511
Plaintiff:
Maggie Netter
Defendant:
Michael Carter and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The People of the State of California v. Prince William Bullock Stewart, III
as 4:2018cv06828
Defendant:
Prince William Bullock Stewart, III, Michael O'Connor, Matthew L. Beltramo and others
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California
Cross Defendant:
County of Alameda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv01825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
