Cases 1 - 10 of 86
BELLISTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20306
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHRISTIAN BELLISTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parker v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Christian Parker
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Elizabeth Laseter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Griffin v. Christian et al
as 8:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Michael Christian, N. Stotler, R. McKInney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spires v. Tuscaloosa Police Department et al
as 7:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Spires
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa Police Department, Noland Michael Christian, Joshua J Senkbeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Radvanyi v. Spokane County Jail and Detention Services
as 2:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael Christian Radvanyi
Defendant:
Spokane County Jail and Detention Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radvanyi v. AMR Ambulance Service
as 2:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael Christian Radvanyi
Defendant:
AMR Ambulance Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radvanyi v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
Michael Christian Radvanyi
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
