Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Shelley v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Shelley
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CLAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33064
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLAY, JR. v. JESSIE TRICE COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
as 1:2023cv22053
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL CLAY, JR.
Defendant:
JESSIE TRICE COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. doing business as Jessie Trice Community Health Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Clay v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19937
Plaintiff:
Michael Clay
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CLAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04980
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MICHAEL CLAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goff et al v. Clay et al
as 9:2022cv03302
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Goff and Brooke Goff
Defendant:
Michael Clay and Beeline Carriers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Heaslet v. Warden, U.S.P. Thomson
as 3:2022cv50239
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Heaslet
Respondent:
Warden, U.S.P. Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 6:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael Clay
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
