Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SCHADWILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13333
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOUGLASS SCHADWILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kyle v. Jackson-Webb et al
as 2:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
Tommie Kyle
Defendant:
C. Jackson-Webb, Michael Douglass, Shelby County Criminal Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOUGLASS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37159
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MICHAEL DOUGLASS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huggins v. Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv00148
Defendant:
Hallmark County Mutual Insurance Company, Michael Douglass and Dee King Trucking, LP
Plaintiff:
Jershara Huggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Hatfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglass Hatfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Hatfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01261
Defendant:
Michael Douglass Hatfield and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
BRISTER et al v. NATOINAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv03693
Plaintiff:
WALTER BRISTER , BONNIE BRISTER , PAUL R. TRIPOLI and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv01397
Plaintiff:
Michael Douglass Dailey
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HALL et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2008cv01120
Plaintiff:
YOLANDE J. HALL and LADAIZA GRAVES
Defendant:
OFFICER DONALD BROWN, MICHAEL DOUGLASS, IPD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
