Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Jones v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00548
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Edward Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Michael Jone
as 16-9948
Movant: In re: MICHAEL EDWARD JONES
:
Gill v. USA
as 6:2016cv02188
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00760
Petitioner: MICHAEL EDWARD WOODS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In Re: Michael Wood
as 16-102
Movant: In re: MICHAEL EDWARD WOODS
:
Rogers v. Daiken
as 1:2015cv00259
Plaintiff: Dianna J. Rogers
Defendant: Michael Edward Daiken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15350
Plaintiff: Dale Carder Bruce and Michael Edward Bruce
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Edward Kennedy v. US Parole Commission We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-6535
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Michael Tankersley v. James Almand We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1081
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL EDWARD TANKERSLEY
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES W. ALMAND, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client Protection Fund, DOUGLAS M. BREGMAN, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client Protection Fund, BARBARA ANN SPICER, in her official capacity as Trustee of the Client Protection Fund and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?