Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Hendrick v. Novoa et al
as 8:2010cv02218
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendrick
Defendant:
Nelson Novoa and Southern Waste Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Hendricks v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2009cv01818
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HENDRICKS et al v. A C AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84067
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS, MICHAEL HENDRICKS, ZANDRA O. HENDRICKS and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Barrett v. Philpot, et al
as 09-7008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EUGENE BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY PHILPOT, Sheriff of Sequoyah County, Oklahoma, TRAVIS GABBERT, Deputy/Jailor, JOHN BUDDY HAMILTON, Supervising/Comanding Officer Tactical Team, OHP Troop C and others
US v. Michael Ringling
as 09-6082
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS J. RINGLING, a/k/a Michael Hendricks Jaysen, a/k/a John Kasell
Barrett v. Philpot, et al
as 08-7116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EUGENE BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNY PHILPOT, Sheriff of Sequoyah Count, Oklahoma, JOHN DOE, #1,OHP Officer, OHP, Troop C, TRAVIS GABBERT, Deputy/Jailor and others
Hendricks v. Underwood et al
as 2:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendricks
Defendant:
Underwood and Hall County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDRICKS
as 1:2008cv01298
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HENDRICKS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT MCCAULEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADAMS et al v.A.C.AND S.INC.,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66352
Plaintiff:
DENNIS C. ADAMS, REBECCA A. ALEXANDER, AARON ALLEN and others
Defendant:
MELISSA LOUELLA BARRON, A C AND S, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
