Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sykes v. USA
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Michael McCray Sykes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCCRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14746
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCRAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv76903
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCray v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Michael McCray
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes v. City Of Fresno et al
as 1:2017at00987
Plaintiff:
Percy Rhodes
Defendant:
City Of Fresno , Lennie Lujan , Michael McCray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rhodes v. City Of Fresno, et al.
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Percy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
City Of Fresno , Lennie Lujan , Michael McCray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Madson et al
as 2:2017cv04058
Plaintiff:
Peterson, Marshall Lawrence Peterson and Union Electric Company doing business as AmerenUE doing business as Ameren Missouri
Defendant:
Madson, William Madson, Donna Madson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCray v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00670
Plaintiff:
Michael McCray
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCray et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
Michael McCray , Shara McCray and Michael (I) McCray
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
