Cases 41 - 50 of 110
MILLER EL v. MACON BIBB GEORGIA, et al.
as 5:2017cv00056
Plaintiff:
SHEIK MICHAEL MILLER EL
Defendant:
MACON BIBB GEORGIA, ROBERT FAULKNER, WILLIAM P ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David Archer, et al v. York City School District, et al
as 17-1223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. ARCHER, on his own behalf and on behalf of his child D.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
YORK CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, MARGIE ORR, JAMES MORGAN and others
EL v. ADAMS, et al.
as 5:2016cv00470
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILLER EL
Defendant:
WILLIAM P ADAMS, JOSHUA STAFF, REBECCA GRIST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Mooney et al
as 4:2016cv00557
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Tom McGinley, Tony Luscavage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv02510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HUNTINGTON KNOLLS, L.L.C v. HOLLAND TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD et al
as 3:2015cv01627
Plaintiff:
HUNTINGTON KNOLLS, L.L.C
Defendant:
HOLLAND TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, TOWNSHIP OF HOLLAND , DANIEL BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
WITHERSPOON v. MILLER
as 2:2015cv01056
Plaintiff:
DESMOND M WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
MICHAEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil et al v. The City Of New York City et al
as 1:2015cv00279
Defendant:
Joell Barnett, City of New York, Sergeant Michael Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Chaka Virgil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
